Cloud-Based vs On-Premise Fixed Asset Tracking Software: Pros, Cons & Security

Introduction

Choosing between a cloud-based fixed asset tracking software (cloud asset management) and an on-premise system is a critical decision for CIOs, IT managers, and finance directors. Top companies implement robust fixed asset tracking systems to improve visibility, control, and reporting. This deployment dilemma impacts everything from accessibility and maintenance to compliance and security. On one hand, online fixed asset tracking software (cloud-based) offers convenience and scalability; on the other, a standalone fixed asset tracking system deployed on-premise gives you greater control.

In this guide, you’ll learn:

• What distinguishes cloud-based and on-premise fixed asset tracking software, and how each deployment model works in practice.
• Why organizations choose cloud or on-prem solutions, including differences in cost, scalability, maintenance, and security.
• How data control, compliance, and IT responsibility vary between cloud and on-premise systems.
• Which deployment model fits your organization best, based on industry regulations, growth plans, and IT capabilities.
• How AssetCues supports flexible deployments, including cloud and private cloud options, to match business needs.

What Is the Difference Between Cloud-Based and On-Premise Asset Tracking?

Cloud-based vs on-premise asset tracking mainly differs in system hosting and management. Cloud-based software(online fixed asset tracking software) is hosted on the vendor’s servers and accessed online, whereas on-premise software runs on your own servers and is managed by IT. Consequently, this difference affects access, updates, data control, and maintenance requirements. Ultimately, cloud systems offer flexibility and remote access, while on-premise solutions provide greater control over infrastructure and data.

To better understand, let’s define each model:

What is Cloud-Based Fixed Asset Tracking Software?

Cloud-based (online) fixed asset tracking software operates on cloud infrastructure and delivers online. Therefore, providers host software and databases securely, while users access via browsers. Meanwhile, vendors manage servers, updates, and uptime, ensuring reliable SaaS performance. Consequently, remote teams centrally view and update real-time asset information anywhere.

Because providers handle infrastructure, organizations avoid buying servers or installing software. Therefore, subscriptions enable instant use, letting teams add assets via the web. Meanwhile, subscription pricing converts upfront costs into predictable operational expenses. In summary, online fixed asset tracking software (cloud-based) delivers accessibility, convenience, and vendor-managed maintenance.

What is On-Premise Fixed Asset Tracking Software?

On-premise fixed asset tracking software is deployed on your organization’s own servers and maintained in-house. In this model, you purchase or license the asset tracking software and install it within your local IT environment (e.g. on a server in your data center). All data — information about your assets, records, and transactions — stays on your premises or private network. Your internal IT team (or a hired contractor) is responsible for managing the system’s infrastructure, including performing installations, applying updates or patches, and ensuring the server hardware is running smoothly.

On-premise asset tracking suits enterprises needing strict security, compliance, and control. Because systems are self-hosted, organizations enforce access rules and operate without internet. Therefore, regulated organizations protect sensitive assets while ensuring data never leaves facilities. However, on-premise solutions offer customization but demand hardware investment and IT management.

Now that we’ve defined each approach, let’s look at their specific advantages.

What Are the Benefits of Cloud-Based Asset Tracking?

Cloud-based asset tracking systems come with several key benefits that appeal to organizations looking for flexibility and lower IT burdens. Here are some of the main advantages of choosing a cloud deployment:

• Accessibility & Remote Work

Cloud-based asset tracking software enables remote access and mobile work anywhere. As long as users have internet, they log in via browsers. Therefore, asset data remains available on-site, remote offices, or home. Consequently, teams share real-time updates, improving collaboration and eliminating tracking delays.

This accessibility benefits organizations with multiple locations or distributed teams. Therefore, it supports remote-work policies and keeps finance, IT, operations informed. In short, cloud asset tracking offers anytime access, boosting productivity.

• Lower IT Overhead

Cloud solutions significantly reduce in-house IT workload and upfront costs. Because providers manage servers, updates, security, and backups, teams avoid maintenance. Therefore, organizations lower IT overhead by outsourcing infrastructure and technical management.

From a cost perspective, cloud deployments eliminate large capital expenditures on servers. Instead, organizations pay subscription fees, avoiding hardware, electricity, cooling, and space costs. Therefore, this subscription model remains budget-friendly and predictable for small and mid-size companies.

In fact, studies show cloud-based software lowers total cost of ownership by 77%. Moreover, savings come from reduced hardware, staffing, maintenance, and upgrade efforts. Overall, cloud asset tracking frees IT teams to focus on strategic initiatives.

• Scalability & Business Continuity

Cloud-based asset tracking scales effortlessly and delivers strong business continuity features. Because systems run on cloud infrastructure, organizations upgrade subscriptions without new servers. Therefore, platforms accommodate new locations or assets on demand, supporting rapid growth. Moreover, during peak periods, the cloud handles spikes and scales back automatically.

Cloud providers ensure high availability and disaster recovery, strengthening overall business continuity. Because data resides on redundant servers with backups, systems remain live. Therefore, even during local disasters, asset data stays secure and accessible. Overall, cloud reliability and scalability provide peace of mind for downtime-sensitive organizations.

• Faster Implementation

Cloud-based asset tracking software deploys faster than traditional on-premise solutions. Because setup remains minimal, users sign up and access systems within hours. Therefore, organizations avoid hardware procurement, installations, and lengthy server configurations. Moreover, vendors provide ready-to-use platforms, enabling immediate system adoption.

In contrast, on-premise asset tracking setup often takes weeks due to installations. Therefore, cloud solutions bypass configuration steps and offer guided onboarding. According to surveys, faster deployment remains a key cloud software benefit. Overall, cloud deployment accelerates time-to-value and return on investment faster.

• Continuous Feature Updates & Integrations

Cloud users benefit from automatic updates and easier integrations seamlessly. Providers continuously improve software, delivering features and security fixes automatically. Therefore, users access latest versions without manual patches or upgrades. Consequently, this evergreen software prevents outdated systems common in on-premise setups.

Cloud-based asset tracking software integrates easily with other cloud services. Therefore, open APIs and connectors simplify linking asset data across enterprise systems. While on-premise integrations need customization, cloud platforms offer plug-and-play connectivity. In summary, cloud solutions streamline workflows and keep systems modern.

What Are the Benefits of On-Premise Asset Tracking?

Despite the popularity of cloud solutions, on-premise asset tracking systems offer distinct advantages that can be crucial for certain organizations. Here are the key benefits of an on-premise deployment:

• Data Control & Security (Especially for Regulatory Compliance)

On-premise deployment gives complete control over data security and governance. Because systems reside on internal servers, sensitive asset data never leaves. Therefore, regulated industries meet strict compliance standards using tailored security controls. Moreover, organizations implement custom protocols and always know exact data locations.

Additionally, on-premise systems eliminate many uncertainties surrounding cloud security concerns. Therefore, without third-party providers, organizations reduce multi-tenant and external breach risks. Moreover, companies deploy physical security measures to add layered data protection. Ultimately, on-premise delivers complete data ownership through self-managed security responsibilities.

• Customization

On-premise asset tracking software enables deeper customization tailored to organizational needs. Because systems run internally, teams modify integrations, reports, or workflows. Therefore, organizations implement bespoke processes using custom fields or approvals. In contrast, cloud solutions usually limit users to standardized configuration options.

On-premise deployments give full environment control over servers, databases, and networks. Therefore, teams optimize performance and run asset systems alongside internal applications. This flexibility supports unique processes and alignment with internal policies. However, customization increases complexity, so organizations must manage upgrades carefully.

• Offline Access

On-premise asset tracking systems operate without internet, preventing disruptions during outages. Therefore, local users access databases via internal networks or private VPNs. This offline capability proves crucial for remote facilities or security-restricted environments. Consequently, teams continue scanning, updating records, and running reports locally.

Operating offline insulates on-premise systems from external network issues and latency. Therefore, local users experience faster responses from servers within buildings. Moreover, organizations run closed networks, virtually eliminating external cyber threats. In sum, internet independence provides reliable continuous asset tracking when connectivity falters.

• Integration with Legacy Systems

On-premise systems integrate directly with legacy systems and on-site databases. Because everything stays internal, organizations simplify integrations without external cloud APIs. Therefore, teams use ODBC, file shares, or local methods securely. Consequently, data syncs faster and remains secure across internal networks.

Moreover, on-premise systems connect seamlessly with local hardware like RFID scanners. Therefore, devices communicate with local servers without constant internet connectivity. Consequently, organizations use custom connectors and direct database links easily. In summary, on-premise asset tracking fits complex legacy IT environments naturally.

• Long-Term Cost Predictability

On-premise investments offer long-term cost predictability and potentially lower lifetime costs. Organizations pay upfront capital expenditure for licenses, hardware, then stable maintenance costs. Because companies own perpetual licenses, long usage periods reduce overall expenses. After depreciation, electricity, IT staffing, and replacements remain predictable and budgetable.

Cloud subscriptions accumulate over time and may increase with usage or pricing changes. Therefore, some finance teams prefer on-prem models that avoid perpetual SaaS payments. Moreover, organizations capitalize software as assets, gaining potential accounting benefits. Consequently, on-premise costs remain controllable, supporting predictable long-term budgeting.

It’s important to conduct a total cost of ownership analysis, as maintenance costs accumulate. However, companies with strong IT infrastructure often achieve cost-effective on-premise deployments. Ultimately, on-premise systems deliver fixed, predictable costs supporting long-term financial planning.

Key Drawbacks to Consider

Both cloud and on-premise asset tracking solutions have drawbacks that you should weigh against their benefits. Below, we highlight the major disadvantages of each approach.

Drawbacks of Cloud Systems

• Dependency on Internet:

  A cloud-based asset tracking system requires reliable internet connectivity at all times. Therefore, outages or slow connections immediately restrict user access and system operations. Moreover, unstable networks can disrupt audits, updates, and halt critical tracking workflows.

• Vendor Downtime & Control:

  When using a cloud service, organizations rely entirely on vendor infrastructure. Therefore, provider outages directly impact asset tracking system availability. Moreover, companies have limited control over maintenance windows and performance issues. Ultimately, users depend on vendor uptime and support responsiveness.

• Recurring Cost & Potentially Higher Long-Term Fees:

  Cloud subscriptions are ongoing, requiring monthly or annual payments indefinitely. Over time, these costs can surpass equivalent on-premise solutions eventually. Moreover, growing assets or users may force higher pricing tiers. In short, cloud operating expenses persist as long as usage continues.

• Perceived Security and Compliance Concerns:

  Some organizations feel less secure storing asset data on third-party clouds. While vendors offer ISO 27001, SOC 2, and HIPAA compliance, trust concerns remain. Moreover, strict regulations or data residency rules may limit cloud adoption. Therefore, many auditors prefer on-premise data control for compliance assurance.

• Less Tailored Customization:

  Cloud asset tracking systems remain standardized across customers, limiting deep customization options. Therefore, organizations configure settings but cannot modify core software or databases. Consequently, teams may adjust internal processes to fit vendor-defined software. Moreover, vendor updates force interface or feature changes on fixed schedules.

Drawbacks of On-Premise Systems

• High Initial Capital Investment:

  Deploying on-premise asset tracking requires significant upfront capital spending initial. Organizations must purchase server hardware, licenses, and supporting data center infrastructure. Therefore, this capital expense becomes a barrier, especially for smaller organizations. In contrast, cloud models are pay-as-you-go, while on-prem pays before value.

• Ongoing Maintenance Burden:

  When running on-premise software, organizations assume full maintenance responsibility internally. Therefore, IT teams manage updates, monitoring, troubleshooting, and operating system upgrades. Moreover, aging hardware increases replacement costs and demands specialized expertise. In short, on-premise systems add continuous IT workload and long-term operational risk.

• Longer Deployment and Updates:

  Implementing on-premise software takes longer due to procurement, installation, and configuration. Therefore, organizations experience slower time-to-value compared to cloud deployments. Moreover, manual upgrades delay new features and risk system downtime. Consequently, teams may lag behind improvements and manage disruptive update windows.

• Scaling Limitations:

  An on-premise system remains limited by installed hardware capacity only. Therefore, scaling requires new servers, migrations, planning, and significant investment. Moreover, over-provisioning adds unused costs, while under-provisioning causes performance issues. Consequently, capacity planning stays a continual concern for on-prem deployments.

• Remote Access Requires Extra Effort:

  Unlike cloud systems, on-premise asset tracking lacks native remote accessibility today. Therefore, teams require VPNs or remote desktops, adding user and IT complexity. Moreover, securely exposing web portals demands firewalls, tools, and careful configuration. Consequently, without extras, access stays onsite, limiting distributed operations effectiveness significantly overall.

• Full Responsibility for Backups and Recovery:

  With on-premise, organizations handle recovery from failures, corruption, or cybersecurity incidents. Therefore, teams must design backups, offsite strategies, and high-availability infrastructure. If safeguards lack rigor, data loss or downtime risks increase significantly. In contrast, cloud vendors mitigate these risks by default often.

• Compliance & Updates on You:

  While control aids compliance, organizations remain fully responsible for regulatory requirements. Therefore, on-prem systems demand internal audits, monitoring, and strict access controls. Moreover, delayed security updates risk non-compliance and vulnerabilities. In summary, on-prem delivers control alongside complete security and compliance responsibility.

Having weighed the pros and cons, the next step is to compare the two options side by side and consider how to choose the right one for your situation.

Comparison Table: Cloud vs On-Prem

The table below summarizes the key differences between cloud-based and on-premise fixed asset tracking solutions across various factors:

How to Decide What’s Best for Your Organization

Both models have their merits, so the optimal choice depends on your organization’s circumstances and priorities. Here are some key considerations to help you determine whether a cloud-based or on-premise fixed asset tracking system (or a mix of both) is best for you:

• Industry & Compliance Requirements

In sectors like healthcare, finance, government, defense, or utilities, strict rules apply. Therefore, data security, privacy, and auditability remain mandatory across regulated operations. For example, hospitals follow HIPAA, while governments enforce data sovereignty laws. Consequently, organizations must choose systems aligning with these regulatory obligations.

That said, cloud providers increasingly offer compliant solutions, including certified government cloud regions. Therefore, verify certifications like FedRAMP, ITAR, ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI-DSS carefully. Moreover, some organizations use private clouds for single-tenant control with cloud benefits. In summary, compliance needs determine whether cloud, private cloud, or on-prem fits best.

• In-House IT Capabilities

Assess your organization’s IT strength and available technical resources carefully. If teams lack server or database expertise, cloud solutions reduce infrastructure burdens. Therefore, staff focus on core activities instead of maintenance and installations. Conversely, robust IT teams may efficiently manage on-premise systems using existing infrastructure.

Be realistic about on-premise ongoing effort beyond initial setup phases. Therefore, continuous monitoring, troubleshooting, and updating demand skilled, available IT teams. Conversely, cloud solutions outsource technical complexity, while on-prem keeps responsibility in-house. Ultimately, choose models your personnel manage reliably, or invest in training.

• Budgeting Style (OpEx vs CapEx)

Consider budgeting preferences and overall financial strategy before selecting deployment models. Some organizations prefer CapEx upfront investments, while others favor OpEx approvals. Therefore, cloud subscriptions spread payments, avoid large costs, and treat software as services. From accounting views, OpEx deducts yearly, while CapEx depreciates over time.

On-premise software and hardware purchases usually fall under CapEx spending. Organizations pay upfront, depreciate assets, and may prefer outright system ownership. However, ongoing operational costs like maintenance and staffing still persist. Thus, on-prem reduces subscriptions but not continuous operational expenses.

Think long-term by performing a 5-year or 10-year cost comparison. Include licenses, hardware, personnel for on-premise, and subscription fees for cloud. If short-term cash flow matters, cloud approvals remain easier. However, long-term cost minimization may favor on-premise despite higher upfront investment.

• Growth & Change Plans

Reflect on your organization’s growth trajectory and required flexibility carefully. If assets, users, or locations will scale rapidly, cloud solutions adapt easily. Therefore, teams scale users and assets without worrying about infrastructure limits. Moreover, cloud flexes during seasonal or project-based demand spikes.

If your organization remains stable with predictable asset needs, on-premise capacity works well. However, when future growth feels uncertain, cloud offers a safety net of adaptability. Additionally, cloud aligns better with digital transformation or cloud-first IT strategies. Conversely, organizations maximizing private data centers may prefer on-premise integration.

Also consider how quickly you need new features and improvements. Growing organizations benefit from continuous cloud updates and faster innovation cycles. In contrast, stable environments may not require frequent enhancements. In summary, choose cloud for agility and scaling, or on-premise for controlled, steady operations..

• Hybrid Deployment (Best of Both Worlds)

It doesn’t always require a pure cloud or on-premise choice. Therefore, many organizations adopt hybrid approaches combining both deployment benefits. For example, teams keep core systems on-premise while using cloud services. Additionally, private cloud deployments deliver cloud convenience with single-tenant control, like AssetCues supports.

When considering hybrid or private cloud, weigh flexibility against added complexity. Hybrid models may introduce integration challenges between on-prem and cloud environments. However, they allow sensitive data to stay in-house while enabling cloud features. Thus, careful planning ensures secure communication and synchronization between systems.

Hybrid cloud adoption is growing because one size rarely fits all. Moreover, it often serves as a transition strategy toward future architectures. Organizations may start on-prem and gradually move cloudward as needs evolve. Ultimately, choose deployments balancing control, performance, and convenience effectively.

Key Takeaways

• Overall, cloud-based fixed asset tracking software offers faster deployment, easier scalability, and lower IT overhead, making it ideal for organizations with distributed teams and evolving asset needs.
• In contrast, on-premise asset tracking provides greater data control, customization, and offline reliability, which suits highly regulated industries with strong in-house IT capabilities.
• Finally, the right choice depends on compliance requirements, IT resources, cost strategy, and growth plans, with hybrid or private cloud models often balancing flexibility and control.

Conclusion

Both cloud-based and on-premise fixed asset tracking software offer distinct strengths. Cloud solutions excel in accessibility, scalability, low maintenance, and rapid deployment. They suit organizations with limited IT resources or remote work needs. Conversely, on-premise systems provide control, customization, and strict compliance alignment.

When choosing, evaluate regulatory requirements, IT capabilities, budgeting preferences, and growth plans. Sometimes the choice becomes clear after carefully weighing these critical factors. However, a hybrid approach can balance flexibility, control, and evolving business priorities. Therefore, select solutions you trust, knowing organizations can transition as needs evolve.

At AssetCues, we understand the importance of this choice. Our platform is available in cloud-based deployments and also supports private cloud (for those who need a dedicated environment), ensuring you can implement fixed asset tracking in the way that best suits your organization. If you’re still unsure which route to take, explore fixed asset tracking best practices and common challenges to make a more informed decision or connect with our experts for tailored guidance.

Contact us for a deployment consultation – our experts can discuss your specific needs and help you weigh the pros and cons in your context. We can also arrange a demo to show you how our asset tracking solution works in both cloud and on-premise setups. Additionally, feel free to schedule a call to explore your deployment options and get personalized guidance.

FAQs

Here we answer some common questions about choosing between cloud and on-premise asset tracking solutions:

Q1. Is cloud-based asset tracking software secure enough for sensitive data?

Ans. Yes, a well-chosen cloud solution can be highly secure for organizations. Top providers implement encryption, firewalls, intrusion detection, and regular audits. Moreover, vendors hold certifications like ISO 27001 and SOC 2 validating security posture. However, security remains a shared responsibility, requiring proper access controls and configuration.

Q2. What if our internet connection goes down – will we lose access to a cloud system?

Ans. With a purely cloud-based fixed asset tracking system, internet connectivity remains mandatory. Therefore, outages block access until connectivity restores, creating operational dependency risks. To mitigate this, organizations use backup links or limited offline functionality. If reliability concerns persist, on-premise or hybrid setups provide safer alternatives.

Q3. Can we switch from on-premise to cloud (or vice versa) later if we change our mind?

Ans. In many cases, migration between deployment models is possible with careful planning. Vendors often support moving on-premise systems to cloud by exporting and importing asset data. Therefore, transitions may require brief downtime for data validation and setup. In summary, migration is feasible but needs resources, vendor support, and contractual consideration.

Q4. Which is cheaper in the long run, cloud or on-premise?

Ans. The total cost depends on time horizon and usage patterns significantly. In short terms, cloud costs less due to minimal upfront investment. Over longer periods, on-premise may appear cheaper, though TCO analyses often favor cloud. Ultimately, cost varies case by case, balancing agility, control, and maintenance effort.

Q5. How do updates and new features work for each model?

Ans. In a cloud model, vendors handle updates automatically without user involvement. Therefore, users receive new features and security fixes continuously. In contrast, on-premise systems require IT teams to schedule and install updates. Ultimately, cloud offers currency and ease, while on-prem provides control with added effort.

Q6. What is a “private cloud,” and is it different from on-premise?

Ans. A private cloud runs cloud software on dedicated infrastructure for one organization. Therefore, it improves security and compliance while outsourcing infrastructure management externally. Moreover, it balances cloud convenience with single-tenant control, unlike shared public clouds. However, private cloud costs more, offering flexibility and control for strict requirements.

Author

CA Falgun Shah

Linkedin

Founder at AssetCues | A Chartered Accountant with 20 years of experience in Finance and Accounting | Transforming Asset Tracking and Management